Show Navigation
Conversation
Notices
-
♻ @kat: "Also, surely asking the client to run the code to build the pages is better design than making everything happen server side." That may be true if you're running an underpowered server that can't generate pages, but not for the user…
-
@kat And then there's the whole security issue that @roland touched on -- I don't want some arbitrary web site running executable code on my computer. And when that #Javascript gets pulled in from multiple sources it's easy (but wrong) to just…
-
And before I forget, this entire thread needs to be tagged with #Javascrippled
-
@maiyannah Local repositories for #Javascript is a good start, but it's Javascript dependency for delivering content that really makes me sad. It's partly an accessibility issue, partly a seach engine visibility issue, partly an archiving issu…
-
@bobjonkman No, it's that without laoding content you can gain some milliseconds and make sites load "faster" (because there's a dynamically loaded spinning wheel instead of a progress bar!).
-
@mk Yes, sure. My point is, JavaScript hate is really "you broke the internet and this could've been done w/ progressive enhancement" hate.