Show Navigation
Notices tagged with activitypub, page 2
-
@eloquence More maintainers is always desirable! Though it's not like they're lining up, as far as I'm aware of .)
I'd say the state is usable, unlikely to go through major changes (in functionality, but adaptation for #ActivityPub for delivering would be great - but things like federated pseudoprivate messaging or such scoping is unlikely to be implemented since there's no guaranteed way to keep confidentiality).
-
-
Exciting news: thanks to all the hard work from a team including @MediaGoblin founder Chris Webber @dustyweb, #ActivityPub has finally been made an official W3C recommended standard! https://u.fsf.org/2g6
-
If I were to describe #activitypub as "SMTP over HTTP using arbitrarily extended JSON", would I be very off? @cwebber
-
@oxenfree @cybermeow @elizafox @cyberpotato @cajun @thatbrickster @lain @heluecht
Hi, I'm @mmn, maintainer of GNUsocial. I reacted when it was written that "many people on gnusocial are angry" and wish to say that !GNUsocial has only love and appreciation for #Mastodon and #ActivityPub.
I believe cooperation is important for libre software and the federated social web. I believe our plural and diverse community should embrace and encourage contributors and development. Any progress we want to make - regardless of anyone's preferred technology - is impeded by hostility and empowered by friendship.
So I want to say thank @cwebber @gargron et al. for all the hard work you actively put into ActivityPub. It's awesome that so many users get in touch with !fs via open protocols.
-
@cwebber Indeed you and others involved with AP spec development have been very inclusive, inviting and encouraging. I very much appreciate your (and everyone else's) efforts that have been put into #ActivityPub.
-
@cwebber The only reason !GNUsocial doesn't have #ActivityPub yet is because I have a fulltime job and noone else has been up for the task .]
Though I'm pretty sure it'd still just be the 100% public parts of AP that would be used/promoted, as I'm pretty much convinced there's no such thing as privacy in the social sphere anyway and anyone using "private" communication in an environment like !GNUsocial or #Mastodon is fooled either by the platform, the administrator or other users. (anything accessible via a web browser isn't made for privacy)
-
I'm perfectly happy that #Mastodon exists, and if it implements #ActivityPub in a future version, more power to it. And if it drops #OStatus support, well, that's what forks (or reimplementations) like #Mastodon are for. But don't blame #GNUsocial developers for not following #Mastodon's road map for the future.
-
@drymer I'd love to implement #ActivityPub and I think it's in the interest of the federation to do so as well.
-
re-hi, !gnusocial & !pumpio, #activitypub seen? <3 http://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/